They Called My Boss After I Asked Them to Stop. Is That Illegal?

Workplace calls came up constantly once I started digging into what happened to me — specifically, what happens if you tell a collector clearly that your job doesn't allow personal calls, and they call your desk again anyway. Here's what I found out, and why this violation is one of the easiest to actually prove.

Somewhere in the middle of reading everything I could find about my own situation, I came across a scenario that a lot of people in the FDCPA complaint data report: a collector calls your workplace, someone tells them clearly that personal calls aren't allowed there, and the collector calls the same desk again anyway.

It turns out that exact situation — a second workplace call after a clear verbal notice — is one of the more straightforward FDCPA violations to identify and document. Here's what I found out.

Before we go further

I'm a consumer who researched this, not a lawyer. Nothing here is legal advice. If a collector called your workplace after you told them not to, a free consultation with an FDCPA attorney is the clearest next step.

The Rule: One Notice Is Enough

Under FDCPA Section 805(a)(3), a debt collector cannot contact you at your place of employment if they know or have reason to know that your employer prohibits that kind of contact. The important part, which I didn't know going in: you don't need to send anything in writing for this specific protection. A clear verbal statement, during the call itself, is legally sufficient.

A second call after notice is a violation

Once you've told a collector — even just once, verbally — that your employer doesn't allow personal calls, any further call to that workplace number is a violation of FDCPA Section 805(a)(3). This applies regardless of whether you followed up in writing.

That said, verbal-only notice has a practical weakness: if the collector disputes that the conversation happened, it can become your word against theirs. That's exactly why, even though the law doesn't require it, writing it down and following up with something in writing matters so much for building a case later.

Why This Violation Is Easier to Prove Than Most

A lot of FDCPA violations turn on what was said during a call — which can come down to competing memories. Workplace calls are different, because there's often independent, objective evidence: the call itself shows up in your employer's phone system, your own call log, or a coworker who took the message. The pattern — a call, your clear notice, then another call — is easier to lay out clearly than a lot of other violations.

§ 805(a)(3) The exact FDCPA provision that makes a second workplace call after notice a federal violation

What They Also Can't Do at Your Workplace

Beyond the repeat-call issue, there's a separate protection worth knowing: even on a first call, a collector cannot discuss your debt with anyone else at your job — not a receptionist, not a coworker, not your manager. If they leave a message with someone else revealing that you owe a debt, that's a distinct violation — unauthorized disclosure to a third party — separate from the repeat-call issue.

What I found out about spouses, by comparison

Interesting side note I came across while researching this: if you're married and the debt is a joint obligation, the FDCPA treats your spouse as a consumer too, meaning the collector can generally discuss it with either of you. That's different from a coworker or employer, who have no such standing — any disclosure to them is a violation regardless of your marital status.

What I Did After the Second Call


What this site is and isn't: I built Me vs. Collector as a consumer who went through this, not an attorney. Nothing here is legal advice. If a collector called your workplace after you told them to stop, please speak with a licensed FDCPA attorney — those consultations are free.